Dileo

(PC) Millner v. Dileo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20191:17-cv-00507California1,343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAMES W. MILLNER, Case No. 1:17-cv-00507-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

v. ORDER AS TO DISPOSITIVE MOTION

DEADLINE, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

DR. DILEO, et al., REQUEST FOR AN IMPARTIAL MEDICAL

EXPERT WITNESS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 60, 61) 14 Plaintiff James W. Millner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants DiLeo, Ulit, and Spaeth, in their individual capacity, for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, based on Plaintiff’s wrist injury. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion requesting an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment, filed on August 27, 2019, which the Court interprets as a motion to modify the scheduling order as to the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 60.) On September 5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.