Strojnik

Strojnik v. The Victus Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20191:18-cv-01620California3,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

20 On May 31, 2019, Plaintiff Peter Strojnik, Sr. filed a motion for default judgment1 against 21 Defendant The Victus Group, Inc. d/b/a Sierra Sky Ranch. (Doc. 11.) No opposition to Plaintiff’s 22 motion was filed. The Court has reviewed the motion and supporting documentation and 23 determined that the matter was suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 24 230(g). As such, the motion was deemed submitted on the papers and no hearing was scheduled. 25 For the reasons set forth below, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for 26 27 1 Plaintiff filed two copies of the motion in the same document. (See generally Doc. 11.) Plaintiff also filed a third copy of the motion on June 6, 2019. (Doc. 13.) Thus, the Court will consider only the first copy of the motion, (Doc. default judgment be GRANTED IN PART and that Plaintiff be awarded the sum of $4,447. II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On November 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging claims for negligence and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; the California Unruh Act,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.