Santoro

(PC) Bozeman v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20191:17-cv-01247California3,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BOZEMAN, 1:17-cv-01247-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

vs. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

KELLY SANTORO, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendants. FOURTEEN DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND David Bozeman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132. On September 18, 2017, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On July 23, 2018, the court screened the Complaint and issued an order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) On August 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 11.) On July 8, 2019, the court screened the First Amended Complaint and entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.