Kernan

(PC) Harris v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20192:17-cv-00680California4,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical claims against defendant Dr. Kuersten, Chief Medical Officer at California State Prison, Solano (“CSP-Solano”). Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is before the court. Defendant filed an opposition, plaintiff did not file a reply. As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. I. Plaintiff’s Claims In screening the operative pleading, the undersigned found that plaintiff may be able to demonstrate that Dr. Kuersten was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs by allegedly interfering with numerous recommendations of specialists concerning the diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff’s chronic GI symptoms, suffered over more than four years,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.