Aubuchon

(PC) Smith v. Aubuchon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20192:14-cv-00775California168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRANVILLE WILLIAM SMITH, No. 2:14-CV-0775-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER B. AUBUCHON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for the court to provide a copy of 19 || the transcript of his deposition at public expense (ECF No. 113). Plaintiff’s motion is denied 20 because the expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is only proper when authorized by Congress, see Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 211 (9th Cir. 1989), and the 22 expenditure requested by plaintiff has not been so authorized, see e.g. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 || Dated: September 9, 2019 Sx

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.