Jimenez

(PC) Jones v. Jimenez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20191:14-cv-02045California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, ) Case No. 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

JIMENEZ, et al., ) ) [ECF No. 144] Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed June 27, 2019. There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require any attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.