(PS) Stephens v. County of Sacramento Dept of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REHEMA STEPHENS, No. 2:16-cv-1849-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
ASSISTANCE OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA WELFARE DIVISION,
16 Defendant.
19 This case was before the court on February 27, 2019 for hearing on the sole defendant County of Sacramento’s (hereafter “County”) motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 35) and the court’s November 16, 2018 order directing plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for her failure to timely respond to the County’s motion (ECF No. 36). Attorney Glen Williams appeared on behalf of the County, and plaintiff appeared pro se. For the following reasons, the order to show cause is discharged and it is recommended that the County’s motion be granted. 27 This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C.…