Blakely

(PC) Dustin v. Blakely

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20192:19-cv-00672California1,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALE DUSTIN, No. 2:19-CV-0672-MCE-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. BLAKELY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and Plaintiff’s motion for court intervention. (ECF No. 10). In Plaintiff’s complaint he attempts to allege a multitude of constitutional and statutory violations. 21 I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT AND STANDARD The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.