Komar
Project Sentinel v. Komar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00708-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR v.
MEYER KOMAR; JEANETTE KOMAR;
and SARAH KOMAR, Defendants. 16 On May 5, 2019, Plaintiff, Project Sentinel, filed this action against Defendants, Meyer Komar, Jeanette Komar, and Sarah Komar. (ECF No. 1.) In the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, entered on May 21, 2019, the Court set an initial scheduling conference for September 10, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 3-1.) The parties were instructed that attendance at the scheduling conference was mandatory. (Id. at 2 (“Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory for all parties. Parties may appear by their counsel, if represented. If a party is not represented by counsel, they must appear personally at the Scheduling Conference.”).) The parties were also advised: “Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory Scheduling Conference .…