(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20192:17-cv-02216California5,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, CONOR No. 2:17-cv-2216-KJM-EFB PS

BUGBEE, KEVIN BURRAGE,

KALEIGH BURRAGE, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. COUNTY OF PLACER, TIMOTHY

WEGNER, STEVE PEDRETTI, JOSEPH

ZANARINI, STEVEN SOLOMON, Defendants. 18 This case was before the court on February 12, 2019, for hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 21), and the court’s February 6, 2019 order directing defendants to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to appear at the initial hearing on their motion, which was on February 6, 2019 (ECF No. 29). Attorney Gregory Warner appeared on behalf of the defendants. Plaintiff Christopher Lull appeared pro se, and the remaining plaintiffs failed to appear. Also pending is the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.