Sexton

(PC) Harris v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20191:18-cv-00080California1,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST S. HARRIS, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00080-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS

) SEXON, et al., ) [ECF No. 50] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 14, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to stay the proceedings. I. BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants Sexton, Aquirre, Stewart, Lambert, Gutierrez, L. Cellobos, and I. Ramirez for subjecting Plaintiff to conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 10, 2018, Defendants filed the instant motion to dismiss the action on the ground that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.