Sherman

(HC) Grant v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20191:19-cv-01242California2,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 CHRIS GRANT, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01242-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO CASE ) v. ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO ) DISMISS PETITION 14 ) STU SHERMAN, Warden, ) [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] ) Respondent. ) ) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) serving a sentence of 40 years-to-life for his convictions in Santa Clara County of two counts of robbery. In this petition, Petitioner challenges a state court decision upholding the CDCR’s determination that he is not entitled to parole consideration under California’s Proposition 57. Upon review of the petition, it is clear that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief. Therefore, the Court recommends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.