UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED

on Sep 11, 2019 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION enStERt I □□□□□□□□□□

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —150)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,509 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. LL LBA

| hereby certify that th d Sep 11, 2079 facinierticatin ahd onroc copy CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols of the original on file in my office. MUCTDISTRICT ITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

ATTEST:

SUSAN Y. SOONG

Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Deputy Clerk Date:.September 11,2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−150 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA NORTHERN

ALN 2 19−00975 Payne v. Monsanto Company ALN 2 19−01020 Woods v. Monsanto Company ALN 2 19−01281 Kinman v. Monsanto Company

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 1 19−01095 Silva v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19−01562 McKim v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 2 19−00600 Fedczak v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00612 Bostick v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00614 Reyff v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00615 Woodruff et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00618 Ford et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00622 Cooper et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19−00623 Williams v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA SOUTHERN

FLS 0 19−61980 Anderson−Cahill v. Bayer Corporation et al

HAWAII

HI 1 19−00426 Dixon et al v. Monsanto Company

LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE 2 19−12309 Simms et al v. Monsanto Company

MICHIGAN EASTERN

MN 0 19−02176 Haba v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19−02355 Moore v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19−02362 Sexton v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19−02364 Welch v. Monsanto Company

MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN

MSN 4 19−00098 Brooks v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19−02342 Bern et al v. Monsanto Company