Hopson

Hopson v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20192:16-cv-03014California3,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CYNTHIA HOPSON, No. 2:16-cv-3014-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUKH C. SINGH, as an individual, as doing business as “Tokay Shell”, and as Trustee for the Sukh C. Singh 2006 Family Trust, PERMINDER K. SINGH, as an individual, and doing business as “Tokay Shell”, and Trustee for the Sukh C. Singh 2006 Family Trust, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 This case is before the court on plaintiff Cynthia Hopson’s motion for default judgment against defendants Sukh Singh and Perminder Singh. ECF No. 15. For the reasons stated below, the motion should be granted.2 ///// /////

This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(19). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 27 Because oral argument would not have materially assist in the resolution of plaintiff’s motion, the matter was ordered submitted on the briefs, ECF No. 18. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.