Vigen

(PS) Johnson v. Vigen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20192:19-cv-00769California1,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD LADON JOHNSON No. 2:19-cv-769-KJM-KJN PS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

LAUREN VIGEN,

16 Defendant.

18 On July 2, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, and provided plaintiff with 28 days to either file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to timely comply with the order may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) After plaintiff failed to file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline, the court considered whether the action should be dismissed. Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and the court’s desire to resolve the action on the merits, the court on August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.