(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20191:17-cv-00817California4,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS v. EMC AND RANDHAWA’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA., et al., DENIED IN PART 11 Defendants. (ECF NOS. 29 & 34)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS 14 I. BACKGROUND Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which was filed on July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 19.) This case is proceeding “on Plaintiff’s FTCA claim against the United States, his Eighth Amendment Bivens claim against the four unknown correctional officers, and his state tort claims for medical negligence and battery against Defendants Haak, Randhawa, and Emanuel Medical Center.” (ECF No. 21, p. 2.) On December 17, 2018, defendant Emanuel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.