Usher

(PC) Bradford v. Usher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20191:17-cv-01128California3,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 1:17-cv-01128-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING AND DECLINING TO

ADOPT FINDINGS AND

USHER, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE

Defendants. RELIEF (Doc. Nos. 22, 24, 25) 17 18 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 18, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in this case, and screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Doc. No. 9.) The magistrate judge found that plaintiff is subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because on three or more occasions he has filed actions that have been dismissed as 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.