Strojnik

Strojnik v. Griffin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20191:18-cv-01619California1,586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER STROJNIK, SR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01619-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS AND

ANITA GRIFFIN, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Peter Strojnik, Sr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se in this action, filed a complaint against Anita Griffin and Greg Griffin (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act and California law. (ECF No. 1.) On November 27, 2018, the mandatory scheduling conference order issued. (ECF No. 3.) On January 4, 2019, Defendants, also proceeding pro se, filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 9.) On February 25, 2019, an order issued requiring the parties to show cause for the failure to file a joint scheduling statement as required by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.