Hall

Hall v. Crow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20191:19-cv-00056California1,774 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDER CONTE HALL, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0056 -DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT v. ) PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO ) PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ROBERT A. CROW, et al. ) THE COURT’S ORDER ) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action by failing to serve the summons and complaint and he was failed to comply with the Court’s order to serve the documents, the Court recommends the action be DISMISSED without prejudice. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on January 10, 2019. (Doc. 1) After he paid the filing fee on March 7, 2019, the Court issued the summons and its order setting a mandatory scheduling conference for June 3, 2019. (Docs. 8, 9) In the order setting the conference, the Court indicated: The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.