Bick
(PC) Tunstall v. Bick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, JR., No. 2:16-CV-2604-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSEPH BICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (ECF No. 57, docketed as plaintiff’s second amended complaint). Plaintiff alleges Defendants violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as well as his First Amendment, Eighth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT AND STANDARD The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if…