Stolz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD ROYCE STOLZ, II, No. 2:18-cv-1923-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE

v. (ECF No. 105) TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 This case arises out of a claim for insurance coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued by Travelers. The property is located in El Dorado Hills, California, and Plaintiff Stolz holds some property interest in it. The case has been significantly side–tracked by multiple discovery disputes, which have largely emanated from Stolz’s abuse of the discovery process. The instant dispute concerns Traveler’s allegation that Stolz has failed to provide meaningful responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents––originally served in September of 2018. (ECF No. 105.) Stolz insists he has responded as best he can, and has asserted multiple objections over the past year––including based on relevance, proportionality, and privacy grounds. (ECF No. 106.) …