Shrewsberry

(PS) Mehl v. Shrewsberry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20192:19-cv-01099California593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN-GLEN MEHL, No. 2:19-cv-1099-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN RICHARD SHREWSBERRY;

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. His declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Defendants have also filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which they noticed for hearing for hearing on September 18, 2019. ECF No. 3. Court records reflect that plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, must be served upon the moving party, and filed with this court, no later than fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date or, in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.