Hemela

(PC) Townsend v. Hemela

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20191:19-cv-01054California841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01054-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 6) HEMELA, et al., ORDER DENYING MISCELLANEOUS

MOTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 7) 16 17 Plaintiff Rebio Ronnie Townsend (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint has not yet been screened. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, filed August 29, 2019, and a miscellaneous motion filed September 11, 2019. (ECF Nos. 6, 7.) I. Motion to Appoint Counsel In his motion to appoint counsel, Plaintiff states only that he would like to have a federal public defender. (ECF No. 6.) Unlike in criminal proceedings where a federal public defender might be appointed, Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.