Pimentel

(PC) Harris v. Pimentel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20191:13-cv-01354California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL HARRIS, Case No. 1:13-cv-01354-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

v. S. ESCAMILLA, ECF No. 197 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Darrell Harris is a state prisoner proceeding with newly-appointed counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 25, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that this court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendant on Harris’s First Amendment and Equal Protection claims. After the remand, Harris (formerly unrepresented) obtained counsel. ECF No. 187. On October 5, 2018, Harris filed a motion to reopen discovery for 120 days so that “he can exchange initial disclosures with Defendant, serve written discovery, and notice deposition.” ECF No. 197-1 at 1-2. Defendant Escamilla has opposed the motion, ECF No. 199, and Harris has responded to Escamilla’s opposition, ECF No. 201. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.