Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20191:16-cv-01467California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS DEFENDANT OFFICER DOE #

v. FOR FAILURE TO SERVE WITH PROCESS F. ROJAS, et al. (ECF No. 51) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Antonio Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds against Registered Nurse F. Rojas and Officer Doe # 3 for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.) Officer Doe # 3 is described in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint as a receiving and release officer employed at Pleasant Valley State Prison on May 16, 2016. (ECF No. 22, at 3, 9.) On October 24, 2018, the Court issued an order advising Plaintiff on his duty to identify Officer Doe #3 for service of process, with information and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.