UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED

on Sep 16, 2019

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —151)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,556 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

5 an FOR THE PANEL: nasmuc’ as noo jection is ered. time, the Lf a | hereby certify that the annexed : ( instrument is a true and correct copy Sep 16, 2019 of the original on file in my office. CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols ATTEST: MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

SUSAN Y. SOONG

Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Deputy ef Date:.September 16, 2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO-151 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 19-07490 Rob O. Abreu v. Monsanto Company CAC 2 19-07494 Todd Chandler v. Monsanto Company CAC 2 19-07499 Jimmie Fulcher v. Monsanto Company CAC 2 19-07542 Terrence M. O'Neill v. Monsanto Company CAC 2 19-07544 Lacy Stormes v. Monsanto Company CAC 2 19-07545 Lisa Vale—Lang v. Monsanto Company CAC 5 19-01653 Gary Archambault v. Monsanto Company CAC 5 19-01654 Jeffrey Baum v. Monsanto Company CAC 5 19-01657 Darlene David v. Monsanto Company CAC 5 19-01676 Jesus Rodriguez Murillo v. Monsanto Company CAC 8 19-01664 Dawn Lowrey v. Monsanto Company

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 19-01698 Winch v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01699 Conyers v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01700 Davie v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01703 Dufore v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01704 Gill v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01705 Guzman v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01706 Whitehouse v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01707 Kalfayan v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01709 Kidwell v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01710 Nelson v. Monsanto Company CAE 2 19-01711 Ruano v. Monsanto Company

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN

CAS 3 o=01045 Peiriez-+Mensante-Company Vacated 9/16/19 CAS 3 19-01644 Dunbar v. Monsanto Company CAS 3 19-01646 Krupinski v. Monsanto Company CAS 3 19-01648 Pena v. Monsanto Company CAS 3 19-01649 Richardson v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 2 19-00611 Hacker v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19-00624 McDonagh v. Monsanto Company FLM 2 19—00633 Schaible v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00389 Baird v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00396 Bickerton v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00397 Castro v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00398 Coleman v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19—00400 Hoff v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19—00405 Ferguson v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-—00408 Franzo v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00420 Estrella v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00421 Schott v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00422 Jilnicki et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00424 Somach et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 5 19-00425 Southerland et al v. Monsanto Company FLM 8 19-02155 Fox et al v. Monsanto Company

IDAHO

ID 1 19-00319 Taylor v. Monsanto Company

LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE 2 19-12340 Watkins v. Monsanto Company

MINNESOTA

MN 0 19-02394 Stoffregen v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02395 Gulley v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02396 Gunderson v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02397 Radermacher v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02398 VanFrank v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02415 Cowan v. Monsanto Company MN 0 19-02417 Straumann v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19-02252 Brand v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02270 Carter v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02274 Fountain v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02277 Guillory et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02279 Sluhocki v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02415 Piotrkowski v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02418 Boudreaux v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02419 Grimmer v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02420 Hardesty v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02425 Freije et al v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19-02427 Garcia et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02428 James et al v. Monsanto Company MOE 4 19-02429 Pankratz et al v. Monsanto Company

TEXAS SOUTHERN

TXS 4 19-03296 Weikerth et al v. Monsanto Company

WASHINGTON EASTERN

WAE 2 19-00298 Johnson—Tannan v. Monsanto Company WAE 2 19—00303 Haase et al v. Monsanto Company