Hargrove

Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20191:17-cv-01743California6,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TATYANA HARGROVE, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01743 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) PRETRIAL ORDER ) v. ) ) ) ) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

18 19 Plaintiff seeks monetary damages for their injuries pursuant to the Federal Court Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671. (See Doc. 1) A. JURISDICTION/ VENUE This Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345(b), and supplemental jurisdiction for Plaintiff’s claims arising under state law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. In addition, the venue is proper in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391. B. UNDISPUTED FACTS 1. Defendants admit that Plaintiff’s claims herein arise out of an incident that took place in the City of Bakersfield, State of California, and within this judicial district. 2. The City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.