Biter

(PC) Williams v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20191:14-cv-02076California2,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERRY WILLIAMS, No. 1:14-cv-02076-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

MARTIN D. BITER and A. MANASRAH, (Doc. No. 47) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 10, 2019, the undersigned issued an order adopting in full the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. No. 43.) In that order, the court dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims except for the conditions of confinement claim alleged against defendant Biter based on plaintiff’s alleged exposure to Valley Fever in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and denied defendant Biter’s motion to dismiss that claim on qualified immunity grounds. (Id.) ///// 26 The court’s order also granted plaintiff leave to amend his claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.