Gastelo

(HC) Pink v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20191:19-cv-01092California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DVONTAE LAROME PINK, Case No. 1:19-cv-01092-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE

v. (ECF No. 7) JOSIE GASTELO, Respondent.

16 Petitioner Dvontae Larome Pink is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 26, 2019,1 the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). (ECF No. 6). In response, Petitioner filed a request for dismissal without prejudice. (ECF No. 7). Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Voluntary dismissal under this rule grants a plaintiff an absolute right to dismiss without prejudice, requires no action on the part of the court, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.