Eldridge

(HC) Turner v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20192:18-cv-01071California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAFONZO R. TURNER, No. 2:18-cv-1071 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN ASCUNCION, Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this habeas action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This action has been stayed since October 25, 2018, pursuant to Mena v. Long, 813 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2016), and Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), for the purpose of exhaustion of state court remedies. See ECF Nos. 8, 9. In response to this court’s order filed August 27, 2019, ECF No. 10, petitioner filed a statement, ECF No. 11, informing the court that he had completed exhausting his claims in the state courts and submitted a new federal habeas petition that was filed in a new case, Turner v. Eldridge, Case No. 2:19-cv- 01577 KJM GGH P. Review of the docket in Turner v. Eldridge, Case No. 2:19-cv-01577 KJM GGH P,1 indicates that the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.