(PS)Howell

(PS)Howell v. PNC Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20192:18-cv-03113California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC S. HOWELL; GENEVIEVE F. No. 2:18-cv-3113 TLN DB PS

HOWELL,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. PNC BANK; AND, DOES 1 THROUGH

INCLUSIVE,

16 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed May 21, 2019, plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed, and plaintiffs were granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiffs were granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and were specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiffs have not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Although it appears from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.