Fox

(HC) Pha v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20192:19-cv-00893California636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NENG SAYPAO PHA, No. 2:19-cv-0893 WBS DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JARED LOZANO,1 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus. Before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as successive and/or untimely. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend the petition be dismissed. Petitioner challenges a conviction and fifteen-year sentence imposed in 2010 in Sacramento County Superior Court for inflicting corporal injury to a spouse, false imprisonment, and making a criminal threat. (See Pet. (ECF No. 1) at 10; Oppo. Brief (ECF No. 16) at 2.) In 2013, petitioner filed a federal habeas action in this court challenging the same judgment. See Pha v. Swarthout, No. 2:13-cv-1133 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal.). The court denied that petition on the merits on May 19, 2015. Id. (ECF Nos. 33, 35). Petitioner appealed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.