(SS) Sparks v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20191:18-cv-00778California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 RODNEY D. SPARKS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00778-JDP 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL 10 v. 11 C SEO CM UM RI IS TS YI ,O NER OF SOCIAL

Defendant.

14 15 This matter is before the court on claimant’s request for judicial review of an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) regarding his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. On September 17, 2019, I heard argument from the parties. I have reviewed the record, administrative transcript, briefs of the parties, and applicable law, and have considered arguments made at the hearing. For the reasons stated on the record at oral argument and in this order, I vacate the administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and remand this case for further proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). As explained in more detail at oral argument, I remand because the ALJ did not give sufficient weight to the disability determination of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.