Arroyo, Jr. v. J.S.T. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL ARROYO, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01682-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

v. REGARDING SUFFICIENCY OF SERVICE

OF PROCESS

J.S.T. LLC, et al.,

DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 6, 7, 15)

17 Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants J.S.T. LLC (“JST”) and Chase, Inc. 18 (“Chase”) (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act 19 of 1990 and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On August 9, 2019, 20 Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment that is currently set for hearing on September 25, 21 2019. (ECF No. 15.) 22 As a general rule, the Court considers the adequacy of service of process before 23 evaluating the merits of a motion for default judgment. See J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Singh, 24 No. 1:13-CV-1453-LJO-BAM, 2014 WL 1665014, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2014); Penpower 25 Tech. Ltd. v. S.P.C. Tech., 627 F. Supp. 2d 1083, 1088…