Foulk

(PC) Burton v. Foulk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20192:13-cv-02123California2,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARRISON BURTON, No. 2:13-cv-2123 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. FOULK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 12, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to compel, regarding his request for production (“RFP”). (ECF No. 28). On November 2, 2018, defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 30). For the reasons stated below, the court shall deny plaintiff’s motion to compel in its entirety. I. RELEVANT FACTS On October 2, 2015, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”). (ECF No. 15). In it, plaintiff lodged claims of retaliation and excessive force against defendant Chenoweth. (See id. at 10-11; see also ECF No. 18 at 5 (court identifying viable claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.