Cardenas

Cardenas v. County of Tehama

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20192:18-cv-03021California611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BEN ROSENFELD (SBN 203845)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

115 ½ Bartlett Street San Francisco, CA 94110 3 Tel: (415) 285-8091 Fax: (415) 285-8092 ben.rosenfeld@comast.net et al., Attorney for Plaintiffs

JONZ NORINE (SBN 182220)

KENNY & NORINE

1923 Court Street Redding, CA 96001 Tel: (530) 244-7777 Fax: (530) 246-2836 10 jnorine@lawnorcal.com et al, Attorney for Tehama County Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO CARDENAS, ET AL. V. Case No. 2:18-cv-03021-TLN-KJN COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al. STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, SUBSTITUTING TRUE NAME OF

DEFENDANT LESTER “BUCK” SQUIER

v. FOR FICTITIOUSLY NAMED

DEFENDANT JOHN DOE #1 IN

COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Defendants. [Local Rule 143]

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiff Francisco Cardenas was unaware, at the time he filed his Complaint on November 20, 2018 (Dkt. #1), of the true name of the officer whom Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.