Edwards

(PC) Cardenas v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20192:19-cv-01066California3,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANNY CARDENAS, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-1066 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.