(PS) Tautau v. FBI of Sacramento, CA, Texas and Georgia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20192:19-cv-01126California361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TUYLLA TAUTAU, No. 2:19-cv-01126 JAM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FBI OF SACRAMENTO, CA, TEXAS

AND GEORGIA.,

14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On July 30, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On September 3, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. Therefore, IT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.