(PS)Loftus

(PS)Loftus v. AT&T, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20192:18-cv-02866California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT C. LOFTUS, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2866 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AT&T, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Robert Loftus is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed June 6, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to comply with the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight-day period expired, and plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Instead, on July 1, 2019, plaintiff filed a notice of interlocutory appeal requesting an 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.