London

London v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20192:17-cv-00687California9,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEBRA LONDON, Case No. 2:17-cv-00687-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff alleges defendant is improperly attempting to foreclose on her home after she successfully concluded Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings. Defendant contends plaintiff violated the parties’ agreement by failing to pay insurance and taxes for her property throughout a portion of the bankruptcy proceedings. Defendant now moves for summary judgment. As explained below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. UNDISPUTED FACTS The following material facts (“UMF”) are drawn from defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s statement of undisputed facts, ECF No. 60-1, plaintiff Debra London’s responses to that statement, ECF No. 68-1 at 2−13,1 London’s statement of undisputed facts (“Pl. UMF”),2 ECF No.

1 London filed an errata replacing her initial filing, ECF No. 66, to “correct citations and []…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.