CDCR

(HC) Egge v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20192:19-cv-01884California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM DEAN EGGE, No. 2:19-cv-1884 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a document entitled application for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner appears to be seeking relief from actions of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Sacramento County Superior Court, and the County of Sacramento. “The writ of mandamus is a ‘drastic and extraordinary’ remedy ‘reserved for really extraordinary causes.’” In re Van Dusen, 654 F.3d 838, 840 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Ex parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258, 259–60 (1947)); see also Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988) (“This Court repeatedly has observed that the writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, to be reserved for extraordinary situations.”). The federal mandamus statute provides: “The district courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.