Sherman

(HC) Fisher v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20192:18-cv-02725California371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACOB FISHER, No. 2:18-cv-2725-WBS-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER STUART SHERMAN, Warden of the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.