Barber

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20192:19-cv-01338California566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 KJN P

BROWN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On July 24, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief in which he seeks pain medication, neck surgery for his disc herniation, a cortisone shot in his shoulder, and renewal of his orthopedic shoe chrono. The court requested an informal response from the Supervising Deputy Attorney General, which was provided. However, since the response was filed, plaintiff has filed multiple declarations, allegedly in support of his motion, or in reply to the informal response provided. (ECF Nos. 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.