Sexton

(PC) Washington v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20191:18-cv-00513California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIEN WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-0513-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

M. SEXTON, et al., (Doc. 20) Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for injunctive relief concerning the conduct of non-party Correctional Officer Alford, whom plaintiff accuses of harassing him for having filed this lawsuit against a friend. (Doc. 20.) Citing security concerns, plaintiff seeks an order transferring him to another yard within the same institution or transferring him to another institution entirely. As noted, plaintiff’s motion is premised on the conduct of an individual not named in this action. Insofar as plaintiff seeks an order directing Officer Alford to stop harassing plaintiff, this Court is unable to issue an order against individuals who are not parties to a suit pending before it. See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.