Washington v. Advance/Newhouse Partnership

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20191:18-cv-00449California197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VOLONDA WASHINGTON, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-0449-LJO- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )

ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, ) (Doc. 20) et. al., ) ) Defendants. )

On September 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation they agreed “that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with the parties bearing their own attorneys’ fees and costs.” (Doc. 20 at 2) Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all remaining parties signed the stipulation, it automatically terminated the action. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.