(SS) Shaban v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20191:19-cv-00111California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA MARIE SHABAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00111-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

SEVEN DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Teresa Marie Shaban (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. On January 29, 2019, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 5). The scheduling order states that within thirty days of service of Defendant’s response to the appellant letter brief Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed. (ECF No. 5-1 at 3.) Defendant served the responsive brief on August 19, 2019. (ECF No. 11.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief nor sought an extension of time to do so. Local Rule 110 provides that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.