(HC)Langley

(HC)Langley v. On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20191:19-cv-00547California2,415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY LANGLEY, Case No. 1:19-cv-00547-DAD-EPG-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DISMISS PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

RAYTHEL FISHER,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

Respondent. TO SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT

(ECF No. 11)

17 Petitioner Randy Langley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 2016 convictions in the Tulare County Superior Court. As the instant petition was filed outside 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)’s one-year limitation period, the undersigned recommends granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing the petition. I. BACKGROUND On June 1, 2016, Petitioner was convicted by a jury in the Tulare County Superior Court of battery against a spouse and disobeying a prior domestic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.