Paramo

(PC) Fields v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20192:16-cv-01085California5,325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLTON DWAYNE FIELDS, No. 2:16-cv-1085 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL PARAMO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court are motions to dismiss filed by defendants Alexander Liu, M.D. and James Jackson, M.D. (ECF Nos. 19, 26, respectively), a motion to strike filed by defendant Liu (ECF No. 19), and a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff (ECF No. 38). For the reasons stated below, the court recommends that defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted and that defendant Liu’s motion to strike and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment both be denied as moot. I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In plaintiff’s second amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.