Bobbala

(PC) Vlasich v. Bobbala

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20192:17-cv-01241California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN VLASICH, No. 2:17-cv-1241-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. BOBBALA, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On April 24, 2019 and after screening plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF No. 11), the court determined that service was appropriate for defendants Bobbala, Sahota, Arya, and Soltanian. ECF No. 15. The court directed plaintiff to submit documents for service of those defendants. Id. at 4-5. On May 8, 2016, plaintiff filed a “Request to Strike Second Amended Complaint or Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint.” ECF No. 16. Therein, plaintiff argues that he inadvertently /////

1 The action currently proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 11); there is no second amended complaint. Nevertheless, the body of the filing makes clear that he seeks to strike or amend the first amended complaint. ECF No. 16 at 1 (“Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.