Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., Case No. 2:17-cv-01515-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GLOBAL AEROSPACE, INC., et al., Defendants. 15 On March 13, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge denied defendants and counterclaimants’1 (“Global” or “Global defendants”) motion to compel the production of multiple documents redacted as privileged and declined its request for in camera review of those documents. Order, ECF No. 189. In that same order, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc.’s motion to compel production of several categories of documents Global contends are privileged. Id. On March 27, 2019, Global moved for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s rulings. Mot., ECF No. 197. Aerojet opposes. Opp’n, ECF No. 200. As explained below, the court DENIES in part Global’s motion and, as to certain portions of the magistrate judge’s order, REFERS this matter back to the magistrate judge for further…